🌿 Alternef Digital Garden

Specification Driven Development

5 min read

Edit on GitHub

Specification Driven Development

Specification-Driven Development (SDD) is a software development approach where detailed specifications are authored before any code is written, serving as the single source of truth for the entire project lifecycle. This specification acts as a contract for how the code should behave and becomes the foundation for generating, testing, and validating code, ensuring higher quality and fewer surprises.

The Problem: “Vibe Coding”

SDD addresses a critical issue in modern AI-assisted development: “vibe coding” - where vague prompts to AI coding agents lead to code that appears correct but fails to meet actual requirements. Language models excel at pattern completion but not at mind reading, making clear specifications essential for reliable outcomes.

The Four Phases of SDD

1. Specify Phase

Goal: Create detailed specifications focused on user journeys and experiences rather than technical implementation details.

Process:

  • Provide high-level description of project purpose and user needs
  • Define success criteria and acceptance criteria
  • Focus on “what” should happen, not “how” it should be implemented
  • Include user flows, edge cases, and error scenarios

Output: Comprehensive specification document serving as the single source of truth

2. Plan Phase

Goal: Define technical implementation strategy while respecting existing standards and requirements.

Process:

  • Define technical stack and architecture
  • Identify constraints and dependencies
  • Consider integration with existing systems
  • Plan for scalability, security, and maintainability

Output: Technical implementation plan aligned with specification requirements

3. Tasks Phase

Goal: Break down specification and plan into small, actionable, and testable chunks.

Process:

  • Create granular tasks like “create user registration endpoint that validates email format”
  • Ensure each task is independently testable
  • Sequence tasks based on dependencies
  • Define acceptance criteria for each task

Output: Prioritized task list with clear definitions of done

4. Implement Phase

Goal: Execute tasks systematically, generating code in small, manageable pieces.

Process:

  • AI agent executes one task at a time
  • Code is reviewed in small increments rather than large dumps
  • Each implementation is validated against specification
  • Iterative refinement based on feedback

Output: Working code that matches specification requirements

Key Benefits

Quality Improvements

  • Reduced Surprises: Clear specifications prevent misunderstandings
  • Better Testing: Each task can be independently validated
  • Consistent Architecture: Planning phase ensures coherent design
  • Edge Case Coverage: Specification phase forces consideration of scenarios

AI Agent Performance

  • Clear Intent: AI knows exactly what to build and how
  • Reliable Results: Structured prompts produce consistent outcomes
  • Better Context: Complete specifications provide necessary background
  • Iterative Refinement: Easy to update specifications and regenerate

Development Process

  • Risk Mitigation: Issues identified early in specification phase
  • Stakeholder Alignment: Specification serves as communication tool
  • Change Management: Updates can be made systematically
  • Documentation: Specification becomes living documentation

Tools and Implementation

GitHub Spec Kit

GitHub’s open-source Spec Kit provides a command-line interface with simple commands:

  • /specify - Generate detailed specifications from high-level descriptions
  • /plan - Create technical implementation plans
  • /tasks - Break down work into actionable chunks
  • /implement - Execute tasks systematically

AI Coding Agent Compatibility

Spec Kit works with multiple AI coding agents:

When to Use SDD

Ideal Use Cases

  • Greenfield Projects: Where upfront specification prevents generic solutions
  • Complex Systems: Multiple components requiring careful coordination
  • Critical Applications: Where quality and reliability are paramount
  • Team Development: Where clear communication is essential

Integration with Critical Requirements

SDD ensures essential requirements are integrated from the beginning:

  • Security Policies: Security requirements specified upfront
  • Compliance Rules: Regulatory requirements built into specification
  • Design System Constraints: UI/UX standards embedded in specification
  • Performance Requirements: Performance goals defined from start

Comparison with Traditional Approaches

vs. Waterfall

  • Similarity: Upfront planning and specification
  • Difference: SDD embraces iterative refinement and AI assistance

vs. Agile

  • Similarity: Iterative development and adaptation
  • Difference: SDD emphasizes detailed specifications over user stories

vs. “Vibe Coding”

  • Advantage: Clear intent prevents ambiguous implementations
  • Advantage: Structured approach produces more reliable results
  • Advantage: Better integration of cross-cutting concerns

Implementation Best Practices

Specification Writing

  • Focus on user experiences and journeys
  • Include edge cases and error scenarios
  • Define acceptance criteria clearly
  • Make specifications testable and measurable

Task Breakdown

  • Keep tasks small and focused
  • Ensure each task is independently testable
  • Sequence tasks based on dependencies
  • Define clear completion criteria

Integration with Existing Workflows

  • Use specifications as documentation
  • Incorporate code reviews based on specification adherence
  • Update specifications when requirements change
  • Maintain specification alongside codebase

Limitations and Considerations

Potential Challenges

  • Upfront Investment: Requires time for specification creation
  • Learning Curve: Teams need to learn specification writing
  • Over-Engineering: Risk of over-specifying simple features
  • Maintenance: Specifications must be kept current

Mitigation Strategies

  • Start with critical features and expand gradually
  • Use specification templates and patterns
  • Balance detail with flexibility
  • Automate specification validation where possible

Conclusion

Specification-Driven Development represents a significant evolution in software development methodology, particularly suited for AI-assisted development environments. By providing clear, detailed specifications before implementation, teams can leverage AI coding agents more effectively while maintaining high quality standards and reducing development risks.

The structured approach of Specify → Plan → Tasks → Implement turns vague development requests into clear, executable intent, making it especially valuable for complex projects where quality, reliability, and maintainability are critical success factors.

References

Backlinks

Graph View